Why can't we make jaegers with weapons both attached and non-attached?
Why can't we make jaegers with weapons both attached and non-attached?
Okay I know that hand-held jaeger weapons are considered useless but still if a jaegers pilots are good at a certain sword fighting style and can combat the unpredictability then it balances out right?
Wait why have a weapon designed to be thrown have a teather to it.
Like that beyond stupid in context of the stealth aspect, when you throw it your just giving your position away and also creating a easy counter option for the kaiju...
Gypsys pilots were good with sword esque weapons, but nobody can convince me that using a boat is not completly rad compared to a sword. the boat was a horribe weapon but damn it was cool.
Agreed but hey it was a hand-held weapon
* I agree on the boat being a cool weapon
The one thing you can't argue against is makeshift hand-held weaponry
Oh but i can, using your enviroment is often an advantage, BUTT! *insert fart noise here* it certainly isnt smart to grab a car and hold it in your hand to "increase" the power of your punch, as a jeagers hand is more dense and in fact WILL CUSHION the impact. just throw it. projectile combat is op. we need jeagers with better guns
I meant boats and stuff like that in size
Its like a brass knuckle - brick debate
Punching sombody with brass knucks is gonna be much better in your hand while a brick is still good, but... its a brick. just chuck it at em
You ingored what i actually said
._.
The same thing can be applied, imagine a couple a bricks stuck together compared to fists of steel. bricks will break way to easy. its a metaphor that can be applied in many places...
You still ignored the boat sized stuff coment i said
What do you think?