FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • I was wondering if you had any sources on either the total number of Kaiju that breached during the events of the first film, or, if not, how many breached during specific years/other periods. If the latter is the case I was considering attempting to estimate roughly how many Kaiju breached.

    You mentioned four Kaiju breaching during 2016 in your recent post, and that kind of sparked my interest.

      Loading editor
    • View all 10 replies
    • Basically, we just don't know for sure. We do know the Kaiju breaching rate was exponential, and we can reasonably assume that the point at which the slope becomes greater than 1 was around 2025, but beyond that we don't really have enough information about the middle period to know just what the exponential curve looked like.

      Exp2
      Exp1 5
      Exp10


      All of these are perfectly valid exponential curves, and are roughly equal around -10 to -8 (which we can say is the equivalent to the 2013-2016 period) and at 0 (which we can compare to 2024 and onward), and because of that we don't really know exactly what the Kaiju curve looked like. At best we can kind of assume the total would have been like 60-80, but beyond that we can't really try to estimate it too exactly. The numbers I had given were just rough guesses based on a pretty "generic" looking exponential curve, but anything could really work.

        Loading editor
    • I'd say minimum in the high seventies/low eighties, we'd probably have more than that even. Hopefully we'll be able to get the line about forty six Kaiju breaching removed soon, or even better - find a proper source with an answer. All we know for certain if that forty six is far too low.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I just wonder as if you are an admin, but seemingly not, and I'm older than you in terms of membership of this wikia.

    Sorry for my poor English, English isn't my first language .

    But I can see, from your attitude, your not so helpful personal. You may call this a personal attack and you may or may not report to an admin, but look at what you wrote. Every trivia is useless if we follow your statement. And you said most likely everyone won't agree, huh? Did you even make a poll to see others' ideas?

    Secondly, your opinion to claim unnecessary is a terrible but typical reasoning to hinder expansion of online encyclopedia. We have to cooperate and contribute to create and grow our wiki, in a constructive way, a nd you shouldn't entirely delete one 's edit just for English quality and you could help correcting it (I'm from Japan, and whenever I saw such cases in Japanese online, I didn't just remove but helped the users' Japanese and talksd with others if the users' edits are controversial). 

    So, stop behaving like an admin and being a speed deleter, and look back at your own words before calling others' ideas as personal and unnecessary. 

    If we won't come to an agreement, I shall ask an admin or make a poll to ask others for their ideas.

      Loading editor
    • View all 9 replies
    • Hey there.

      It's nice to hear from you again, would you like to keep in touch over an instant messaging service where we can communicate faster and more frequently? Do you have Reddit, Discord or Twitter at all?

        Loading editor
    • Thanks man, cool. 

      I have an Twitter account. You can leave message any time.

      @CorrectNansu

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Only one primary brain and three secondary brains are present in the fusion. Do you think they were cast aside or merged with Shrikethorn’s?

      Loading editor
    • View all 7 replies
    • It’d have to be on a bonus disc since they already produced the original blu-ray.

        Loading editor
    • True, we get a lot of extra content of behind the scenes footage/cut content.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi

    I noticed you changed "wrests" to "wrestles" on the Mutavore page. I believe "wrests" is the more applicable word, as it's described as forcibly pulling something away from someone, rather than a misspellinng. I'd like to revert the edit, but I figured it would be easier and more polite to discuss the issue rather than simply make the change without giving a reason for it.

    Sincerely,

    Chrome

      Loading editor
    • Hello,

      Thank you for contacting me first, appreciate it. I can see why you'd suggest "wrests" over "wrestles", and upon reviewing the fight again, I agree that "wrests" may be a better choice of wording. Feel free to revert the edit at your discretion.

      Many thanks,

      Spartan.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, welcome to Pacific Rim Wiki! I'm a member of FANDOM's Community Support team. Thank you for your edit to Were Otachi and Leatherback really out to devour Newt in Pac. Rim 1?!

    It looks as though none of the admins for this community are active right now, but if you need help, check out our help pages or stop by Community Central to explore our forums.

    And don't forget to check out FANDOM University for quick how-to videos.

    Enjoy your time at Pacific Rim Wiki!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.